Updated Newsletter - 31st
March 2020
An Easter Egg hunt that we can ALL safely take
part in WIN $1000
Findmypast offer 20% discount BREAKING NEWS
No birthday guests for the oldest man in the
world
Happiness and second thoughts on DNA
Spanish Princess is first Royal to succumb
Coronavirus in Ambridge - but not until May
Review: Lost Heirs of the Medieval Crown
Review: A Hidden History of the Tower of London
Review: Scotland Yard's Flying Squad
Historical information relating to the Metropolitan
Police
The LostCousins
newsletter is usually published 2 or 3 times a month. To access the previous issue
(dated 23rd March) click here; to
find earlier articles use the customised Google search between this paragraph
and the next (it searches ALL of the newsletters since February 2009, so you
don't need to keep copies):
To go to the main
LostCousins website click the logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not
already a member, do join - it's FREE, and you'll get an email to alert you
whenever there's a new edition of this newsletter available!
At
this time many of us are being forced to choose between helping ourselves and
helping others - should we risk infection in order to assist others who are
older and frailer? It's quite a conundrum when we're fighting an enemy that we can’t
see.
Fortunately
there's one activity that doesn’t involve difficult choices - you can do an
enormous amount of good, and help yourself at the same time. Best of all, it’s totally
risk-free because you can do it from the comfort and safety of your own home!
Want
to know more? Here's the email I received from Vanessa at the weekend:
Inspired
by your last newsletter, I decided to add more ancestors to my account so that
I could qualify to join the Lost Cousins Forum. I also encouraged my husband to
register, so that I can help him add his ancestors.
I
would highly recommend adding your ancestors to LostCousins. Finding and
connecting with new cousins is really exciting. I connected with a new
3rd cousin on the day I first registered. This week I have a connection with a
new cousin. My husband has found connections for 2 new cousins and 1 possible
relative.
There
are other benefits. Adding more ancestors, has also given me the opportunity to
revisit and review the information I have about my ancestors and those of my
husband. It is several years since I first researched my direct ancestors,
during which time more records have become available online. By adding
information from the 1881, 1841 and 1911 English census to LostCousins, I am
now discovering details I had not noticed before about my ancestors and those
of my husband. I am also updating and adding missing information in our family
trees.
That's
just one side of the story - by making those connections Vanessa has also
brightened up the lives of her cousins (and her husband's cousins too - does
your partner have a LostCousins account?).
We
all have thousands of living cousins but, of course, they're not all
researching their family tree. Adding the details of our relatives who were
recorded in the 1881 Census allows us
to connect to the ones who share not only our ancestors, but also the wonderful
hobby that helps to preserve their memory.
An Easter Egg hunt that we can ALL safely take part in WIN $1000
Why should Vanessa
and her cousins be the only ones to have fun? No reason at all - anyone reading
this could follow Vanessa's example. But to make it an extra special experience
I've come up with a unique idea, one that will enable LostCousins members like you
to find cousins, have fun, and win prizes.
I've
hidden 100 Easter Eggs in the 1881 Census. There are 90 LostCousins
subscriptions, 9 Ancestry DNA tests, and the Grand Prize of $1000 (or €1000 or
£1000, whichever is the winner's local currency).
The
Easter Eggs have been scattered across the three 1881 censuses that we use at
LostCousins: the England & Wales census (which includes the Channel Islands
and the Isle of Man), the Scotland census (which includes the Scottish islands),
and the Canada census. Each Easter Egg is associated with an individual
recorded in the census - half of them are male, half female.
All
you need to do to have a chance of winning one or more of those prizes is to add
your relatives from the 1881 censuses to your My Ancestors page - every
single relative you enter from 1st April until the competition ends is not only
a potential link to a 'lost cousin', it’s also a potential prize-winner.
Click
the Search button at any time to find out whether you've hit the jackpot.
If you've got new matches go to your My Cousins page and take a look in
the New Contacts section - the initials of the person you’re matched
with will be shown. If they appear as EE, well - you could have a cousin called
Egmont Everyman, or Elspeth Expert - but there's a good chance that you've been
matched with a dummy account I've set up called Easter Egg, in which case (unless
someone else got there first) you've won a prize!
Terms
& conditions:
prizewinners will need to demonstrate how they are related to the person they've
entered in order to claim their prize (although in practice I'll probably only
ask you to do this if you've won one of the bigger prizes). Automated means of
adding relatives are banned, unless you're a user of Family Tree Analyzer, in
which case you can utilise that program to add relatives from your tree (but please
remember to check your entries against the census transcript). Each prize can be
won only once, by the first member to enter the relevant person from the census
(click the tick against that person on your My Ancestors page to check whether
anyone else, apart from EE, is linked to them).The competition is currently
scheduled to end on April 14th but might be extended (or shortened).
Findmypast offer 20% discount BREAKING
NEWS
Until
14th April you can save 20% on any 12 month subscription at Findmypast's UK
site when you follow this link
(if you can't see the wording 20% discount applied below the
subscription prices enter the code FMPEASTER20, but it should be automatic when
you follow my link).
This
discount brings the cost of a PLUS subscription (British and Irish records) down
below £100, and means that a PRO subscription (which includes virtually
unlimited access to ALL of Findmypast's billions of worldwide records as well
as their entire newspaper collection), costs only about 5% more than the normal
price of a PLUS subscription!.
Please
note that this offer is open to lapsed subscribers as well as new subscribers.
And you can also secure a FREE LostCousins subscription when you support
LostCousins by using the link above (and making sure that your purchase is
tracked as coming from this newsletter by following the advice that follows). You'll
get a 6 month LostCousins subscription when we receive commission on your
purchase of a PLUS subscription, and a 12 month LostCousins subscription if you
choose a PRO subscription.
HOW TO SUPPORT LOSTCOUSINS AND GET A FREE LOSTCOUSINS SUBSCRIPTION
Unfortunately simply clicking one of my links doesn’t absolutely guarantee
that you'll be supporting LostCousins when you make your purchase, because these
days quite a few people use adblocking software, or have disabled tracking in
their browser. Whether you've done this deliberately or inadvertently, it can
have a big impact on small independent websites like LostCousins - in effect you’re
telling the big website that you're buying from to ignore the information about
which site you just came from. This prevents them from paying any commission on
your purchase - great news for the big website, since it adds to their profits,
but very tough on the small genealogy websites that depend on that income.
If you help LostCousins then LostCousins will help you. Your
subscription will commence on the day you bought your Findmypast subscription
unless you already have a LostCousins subscription, in which case I'll extend
it by 6 or 12 months, as appropriate.
Tip: if you are also researching on behalf of your partner or
another family member you can link the two accounts together and get a joint
subscription covering BOTH accounts. Simply enter the other person's Membership
Number (found on their My Summary page, or in a Password Reminder email), in
the relevant box on your My Details page.
First make sure that your purchase is going to be tracked. If you normally
use Firefox, Opera, or Safari I suggest you load up this newsletter in a
different browser, such as Chrome or Microsoft Edge, before clicking the link
above and making your purchase. All major browsers are free, so it makes sense
to have a choice (many problems can be solved by using a different browser).
Tip: it's well worth installing multiple browsers as some websites
for newspapers and magazines only allow a limited number of free articles each
month; if you have two browsers you can usually have a double helping!
I also suggest you use a computer rather than a smartphone or
tablet, but whatever device you choose, stick to it - clicking my link on one
device and making your purchase on another won't work.
You'll find the 'Do not track' switch under Privacy & Security settings in Chrome
- the default setting is OFF, as shown below, and this is what you want:
The switch should be to the LEFT and appear grey. If the switch is
to the right (and blue) then please move it to the left.
In Edge you'll find the switch under Privacy & Security
settings, and it works in the same way. If it appears blue with a white dot,
move it to the left so that it is grey with a black dot.
Once you are satisfied that your purchase is going to be tracked,
click the link and make your purchase, noting the EXACT time of the purchase,
without which I cannot confirm that you qualify. You may receive an email
receipt for your purchase from Findmypast - if so you can forward this to me to
claim your free LostCousins subscription. Otherwise send me an email quoting
the precise time (and date) of your purchase (including the time zone), and stating
the price you paid for your subscription.
IF IN DOUBT PLEASE CHECK WITH ME BEFORE MAKING YOUR
PURCHASE - AFTERWARDS WILL BE TOO LATE!
Since
1st July 1837 parents in England & Wales have been expected to register
births within 42 days - but now many Register Offices are refusing to register
births.
To
give just one example, in Essex (where I live) the Registration Service is only
registering deaths and stillbirths, and only at three locations across the
county. The Essex
website doesn’t indicate that the 42 day limit has been relaxed (nor does the
GRO website, as far as I can ascertain), but the Derbyshire
and Surrey
websites do.
In
Essex new bookings for marriages aren’t going to be taken before 1st July and,
because of the need to clear up the backlog of marriages that have been postponed,
ceremonies not already booked won’t take place before 1st September.
Fortunately
children who are born prior to their parents' marriage can be legitimated by
the subsequent marriage, but it's inevitable that there will be more children
born outside marriage as a result of the pandemic. Yet another complication for
the family historians of the future!
Local
register offices are not going to be providing copy certificates while
Government restrictions are in place, but the General Register Office is
continuing to take orders, though they have asked for non-essential orders to
be delayed:
Note
that they don’t distinguish between orders for certificates and orders for
PDFs. I recommend deferring all orders until restrictions are lifted - and who
knows, in the interim you might find that one of your distant cousins already
has a copy of the relevant register entry?
Scotland
is also affected see this page for more information.
No birthday guests for the oldest man in the world
At
112 Bob Weighton is not only the oldest man in Britain, but the oldest man in
the world. But while he lived through Spanish Flu and other epidemics he's not
able to celebrate his 112th birthday because of the coronavirus outbreak (see
this BBC article
for more information).
Let's
hope that Bob is able have an extra special celebration in a year's time!
The
Genealogist has added colour tithe maps for Essex to a collection that also
includes colour maps for Bedfordshire , Warwickshire, Rutland, Huntingdonshire,
Buckinghamshire, City of York, Middlesex, Northumberland, Surrey, Westmorland,
and the North and East Ridings of Yorkshire (as well as black and white maps
for most of England).
You
can save on a subscription to The Genealogist, and get a free subscription to Discover
Your Ancestors online magazine if you follow this link.
Finding
new cousins is exciting, but we mustn't forget the cousins we already know -
some of whom are likely to be enduring particularly difficult restrictions at
this time.
At
a time when many of us are 'confined to barracks' exchanging hints and tips
makes a lot of sense. There's bound to be someone who has a recipe that'll make
use of the items you've just found at the bottom of your freezer, or the back of
your store cupboard.
Emails
and other electronic messages are a boon at a time when we're being advised to
quarantine incoming post - I generally leave paper items for 3 days and plastic
items for 7 days before opening them, and even then I'm very careful to avoid
touching my face before I've thoroughly washed my hands.
Happiness
and second thoughts on DNA
Ann
in Canada sent me this story of her DNA experiences - I hope it will encourage you
to think carefully about how secrets revealed by DNA testing might affect
others:
"A few years ago, I had my DNA done. I
sat back and waited for – well, I don’t know what I thought would happen!! For
months and months, I had matches with folks I either knew – cousins I was in
touch with on a regular basis or I had matches with cousins so remote that it
did not really matter that much.
"Then, I had a match which seemed a bit
odd. I had a missing branch in one of my trees and this person had a man in her
tree which seemed to fit. I contacted her. The man in her tree was the long
lost brother of my great grandmother. He had gone to the US from Canada and had
fought in the Civil War there. His offspring remained in the USA. WOW!! Pretty
cool!! But there were more surprises to come.
"About 4 months ago, I had a match show
up for a person I did not know but it was a match closer to me than any other I
had seen – including a great nephew. I had no idea who this person was. I
looked at her tree online and there were no common names. There was also no
information on her father’s side of the family. I contacted her and got one of
the biggest surprises of my life.
"After confirming our suspicions by
having her father’s DNA done – I have a half brother!!
It seems that my father (who has been dead
for more than 50 years now) had a relationship before he married my mother. Not
surprising. He was a handsome and personable man. Whether he knew or not, we
will never discover but that relationship produced a son. At the age of 70
plus, I have acquired a new brother who is now almost 90. I will be meeting him
this summer. I am delighted and (although a bit overwhelmed I am sure) I think
he is delighted as well.
"This whole wonderful and happy
experience made me think about the ramifications of DNA testing and posting
matches etc. I wondered about two girls I knew who had had babies in the 1960s.
Both had given them up for adoption – that was the way of things then. One was
desperate to locate her son after all the years had passed. He was the only
child she ever had. She was not successful via official channels.
"Perhaps she would have found him if DNA
testing had hit its current popularity while she was still alive. She died before
that could happen.
"The other girl is the one whose
situation is a bit more concerning to me. She married, had children and told no
one about her child. I doubt that even her younger siblings know. It started me
wondering – what would happen if one of her children or a niece or nephew had
their DNA done and got a match like I did. A close match to a person whose
existence was unknown to them. What then?
"My situation has a happy ending. But would
a frightened and likely traumatized girl who was more or less forced to give up
her child at birth be happy to have her “shameful secret” made public? I doubt
it. And what would it do to relationships within her nuclear family?
"DNA testing has come a long way and
will go a lot further. Having your DNA potentially help to identify a killer
you did not know was a 4th cousin is not too traumatic. But having a past you
had carefully hidden for 50 years explode into the public domain - well, that
is a whole different kettle of fish."
Remember
that if you test you’re in a good position to manage any awkward situation
that might arise. But if someone else in your family tests, perhaps unbeknown
to you, you might not find out until too late. Forewarned is forearmed!
Spanish Princess is first Royal to succumb
You
may recall that when I wrote
about the origins of the term 'Spanish Flu' two weeks ago I mentioned that King
Alfonso XIII of Spain was one of the first high profile figures to contract the
disease.
Thankfully
he recovered - just as Princes Charles, the current Prince of Wales, has
recovered from COVID-19 - but a distant relative of King Alfonso, Princess
Maria Teresa of Bourbon-Parma has not been so fortunate, dying from the coronavirus
infection on 26th March at the age of 86.
You
can read more about this story here,
on the CNN website.
It's
not at all unusual to discover that a relative has been counted twice in the census,
but to find one who is recorded twice in the same household is quite remarkable.
In
1881 Mary Barron (formerly Barke) was living with her husband William and their
infant son, also William, at 5 Sebbon Street, Finsbury - she was recorded as 19
years old. But as you can see from the census schedule her parents and siblings were living at the
same address, and Mary is also recorded in their household - though she's shown
as only 18 years old.
©
Crown Copyright Image reproduced by courtesy of The National Archives, London,
England
with
the permission of Findmypast
Incidentally,
can you find Mary Barke in the GRO birth indexes? I found her, but I suspect you
will find it more difficult than you expect!
Tip:
if one of your relatives appears twice in one of the censuses we use at
LostCousins you can - and should - enter them twice on your My Ancestors page. The
LostCousins system matches census entries, not individuals, so if a relative
appears on more than one census you can enter them twice (or even three times).
Mistakes
continue to be made in the censuses, even in modern times. This article
from The Guardian illustrates how many people were missed or
double-counted in the US 2010 Census - and with an epidemic across the nation
it could be even more challenging in 2020.
This
page
has links to the latest information about the US Census, which takes on 1st
April.
Coronavirus in Ambridge - but not until May
The
world's longest-running radio drama series is going to feature coronavirus -
but not until May.
The
Archers,
which was first broadcast in 1951 as a way of informing farmers about the
latest methods, is recorded several weeks in advance - so until 4th May
Ambridge (set in the fictional county of Borsetshire) will be a haven of tranquillity
for those of us plagued by coronavirus.
I
first heard The Archers about 60 years ago - long before I discovered
that most of my ancestors were farm labourers - and have met several of the
actors over the years, but as far as I know there's only one member of the cast
who is a LostCousins member, and that's Timothy Bentinck, who plays David
Archer.
Tim
Bentinck is a man of many talents, as you can see from his Wikipedia page - and he's also the
Earl of Portland, and a Count of the Holy Roman Empire, which means that his
family tree is rather more interesting than most!
Review: Lost Heirs of the Medieval Crown
The only exam I've
ever failed was History 'O' level - it was a subject which, at the time, I found
both boring and meaningless - so it's somewhat ironic that I now spend a lot of
my spare time reading (and enjoying) history books!
I
should stress that I'm talking about history, not historical fiction - the
latter doesn't interest me in the slightest since the real thing is just as
exciting as any novel, provided it’s told by someone who really knows the subject.
Lost
Heirs of the Medieval Crown: The Kings and Queens Who Never Were, by the pseudonymous
J F Andrews, is just the sort of history book that would have maintained my
interest as a schoolboy, if only it had been on the curriculum at the time. Then
I only learned about the Princes in the Tower, Perkin Warbeck, and Lambert Simnel
- all of whom do feature in this book, but only at the end. Here's an example
of what's in store....
Everyone
knows that William the Conqueror was succeeded by his son, who became William
II - but very few people know that William wasn't the eldest son. Indeed, he wasn't
even the eldest surviving son!
The
eldest son of William the Conqueror was Robert - known as Robert Curthose, a
nickname inspired by his lack of height. Robert was put in charge of Normandy
in 1068, 2 years after his father conquered England - he was just 16 years old,
but no doubt anticipated that in due course he would be Duke of Normandy, and
eventually King of England. Provided he outlived his father, of course.
But
he didn't become King when his father died in 1087 - that prize went to his
younger brother William Rufus. Nor did Robert become King when William II died
in 1100; his youngest brother Henry got the job instead - and this is just part
of the first chapter of this fascinating book!
There
are many more revelations, such as the time when there were two Kings of
England, or the occasion when the reigning monarch attempted to bring rival
factions together with a peace march. Lost Heirs of the Medieval Crown takes
us on a circuitous route from Hastings to London, or to put it another way,
from 1066 when William the Bastard became William the Conqueror, to 1499 when
Edward, Earl of Warwick, undeservedly lost his head at Tower Hill.
If
you like history you'll love this book - and no doubt you'll have your own opinion
as to which of the heroes and villains would have made good monarchs. I read the
hardback version, and whilst the Kindle version is cheaper, bear in mind that
this is the sort of book that you'll want to lend to others (just make sure you
get it back!). Highly recommended, even at the full published price of £19.99
Amazon.co.uk Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.com.au Wordery
Note:
I've included a link to Wordery, even though they are currently out of stock, because
they ship worldwide.
Review: A Hidden History of the Tower of London
Several of the key characters in Lost Heirs
of the Medieval Crown spent time in the Tower of London, and so also turn
up in John Paul Davies' book A Hidden History of the Tower of London:
England's Most Notorious Prisoners.
Unfortunately,
whilst the author clearly knows his topic, I didn’t find this book nearly as readable
- there was a little too much detail for my liking, and not enough of a story
to hold it all together. But I'm clearly in the minority, because everyone who
has reviewed it on Amazon so far has given it a glowing review and a 5 star
rating (perhaps the fact that I haven’t visited the Tower of London for a long
time puts me at a disadvantage).
I'd
always thought that Rudolf Hess was the last person to be held in the Tower,
but on the last page of the last chapter I discovered that the twins who are
the subject of my next book review were held there in 1952, after deserting
from the army during National Service, then punching a policeman.
Amazon.co.uk Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.com.au
I'm not quite sure
why Ronnie and Reggie Kray, two of London's most notorious gangsters, have been
the subject of so many books and films,
but you’d certainly think that all angles had been covered.
However
Caroline Allen, the author of The Krays' London: A History and Guide may
have found a new angle - she has chosen to focus on the buildings that featured
in the Krays' life, even though many of them are no longer standing. I suppose it’s
intended a guide book for those who get a frisson of excitement when they visit
a location where something horrible happened. And, to be fair, in normal times
there are plenty of tourists who'll sign up for a walk around the sites where
Jack the Ripper's victims met their end - so perhaps there is a market for this
sort of thing.
Although
Caroline Allen writes frankly about the crimes that the Kray twins and their
associates committed, she's clearly proud of the fact that her grandfather (or
perhaps her great-grandfather - the book is imprecise on this point) was Ronnie
and Reggie's hairdresser. But I see it as a dubious connection to an infamous
couple - not something to get excited about.
Carrying
out a bit of research of my own I discovered that in 1939 the Kray family were
living at 218 Hackney Road, Bethnal Green - an address that doesn't feature in
the book. According to the author the family moved from Stean Street in Hoxton,
said to be their birthplace, to Vallance Road in Bethnal Green when the twins were
6 years old. Looking at the 1939 entries for Stean Street suggests that part of
the road had been recently redeveloped, which might explain why the family
moved.
Glancing
at the image above you might assume that the notes in black ink at the right
relate to Reginald Kray, but the two pages are slightly out of sync - it’s
actually 'See page 16' in red biro that's relevant (at Findmypast you'll find
the continuation on image 12 out of 14). Continuation entries were used when
the right-hand side of the page filled up.
By
the way, the Tower of London doesn’t feature in the book - but according to Wikipedia
the Kray twins were indeed the last people to be held prisoner in the Tower.
"Infamy, infamy..." as Kenneth Williams famously proclaimed in Carry on Cleo (1964).
Amazon.co.uk Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.com.au
Note:
Barbara Windsor, who was one of many minor celebrities to associate with the
Krays, claimed to have been offered the role of Cleopatra in 'Carry on Cleo',
although this has been convincingly disputed. But one actress who did have a part
in that film was Sheila Hancock, who in 1969 married actor John Thaw, whose
first big role was in The Sweeney - which
neatly leads into my next review.....
Review: Scotland Yard's Flying Squad
Known
in Cockney rhyming slang as "The Sweeney" (for "Sweeney
Todd"), the Flying Squad came into being just over a century ago. In those
days the Metropolitan Police area was divided into 20 divisions, and officers
were only supposed to investigate crime in their own division - which, as you
can imagine, made it rather difficult to pursue criminals who didn’t respect
the dividing lines!
The inspiration for
the Flying Squad, a unit that could follow criminals across the entire Metropolitan
Police
area, came from Chief Inspector Frederick Wensley - who
30 years earlier had been pounding the streets of London chasing Jack the
Ripper, so might conceivably have known Inspector Frederick Abberline,
who was in charge of the Ripper enquiry (and also happened to be married to my
1st cousin 4 times removed).
But
when Wensley came up with the idea in 1916 Britain was engaged in the greatest conflict
the world had ever known, so it wasn't until 1919 that his plan came to
fruition.
The
Flying Squad took a pragmatic approach to policing, employing informants to
snitch on fellow miscreants - but by most accounts they ended up crossing too
many boundaries, and in the 1970s 'Operation Countryman' was set up to investigate
police corruption. Perhaps not surprisingly, Dick Kirby - the former Flying
Squad officer who wrote this history - has nothing but contempt for the members
of the Countryman team, and he takes a similarly dim view of the investigation
that brought down Ken Drury, the Flying Squad commander, in 1972. Anyone who
has watched Line of Duty will have seen the same attitude, albeit in a
fictional setting.
Note:
this article
from The Guardian records how efforts were allegedly made to prevent the true
scale of wrongdoing from coming to light.
But
much as I enjoy watching crime series on TV, I wouldn't want to do the job
myself, and I suspect that goes for most of you. Law enforcement necessarily
involves dealing with people whose morals and manners are far removed from our
own - people like the Krays (although they hardly feature in this book). If you're
interested in real life crime, rather than crime fiction, this book will be
right up your street - all of the reviews at Amazon give it 5 stars!
Amazon.co.uk Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.com.au
Historical
information relating to the Metropolitan Police
In
researching the reviews above I stumbled across a PDF document containing lots
of information about the history of the Metropolitan Police including details
of what records are held and where. It seems that it used to be available at
the Met's own website - but is now only online because of a 2017 Freedom of
Information request.
You'll
find the document here
- I have a suspicion that even if you don’t have relatives who were in the Met
you'll find it interesting.
Talking
about the Met Police reminds me that another Met, the Metropolitan Opera in New
York, are offering free streaming of some of their past productions during the
pandemic - you can find out more here.
MET
is also an abbreviation for 'Metabolic Equivalent of Task' a measure of how
much energy is expended compared to the body's resting rate. I first encountered
the term when I bought Wii Fit, the exercise program for the Nintendo
Wii, and in fact I still use Wii Fit Plus and Wii Active as a
means of getting exercise indoors. As a result I know that since I began
self-isolating 16 days ago I've lost 6lbs in weight, bringing my Body Mass
Index down from 25.50 (Overweight) to 24.74 (Healthy). So it’s not all bad news
at the moment!
By
the way, most of the weight reduction isn't the result of exercising more, but
of eating less - something that's a lot easier to do when you know that you've
only got a limited amount of food in the fridge, freezer, and store cupboard.
Eating a third less doesn't sound a particularly attractive option until
you reframe it as making the food you've got last 50% longer!
Are
you getting enough exercise? Last week was sunny so we were out in the garden,
but this week is going to be cold, so we're converting our dining table into a
table tennis table. It's what we did when I was a boy, so why not do it now?
It's not as if we're going to be having friends round for dinner in the foreseeable
future! I already had the equipment, but you can buy sets quite cheaply on Amazon - though the delivery times are quite
long, so I suspect most of them are coming from China (the one place that seems
to have got the virus really under control).
If
you can manage it safely, running (or even walking) up and down stairs is great
exercise. But if walking on the flat is all you can manage, try to up the pace
- according to an article
in New Scientist two weeks ago walking at 5mph uses as much energy (8
METS) as running at the same speed, but without the same risk of injury.
My
wife and I started self-isolating on Sunday 15th March, the day we were due to
fly to Portugal for a holiday at Rocha Brava - the beautiful resort which
hosted Genealogy in the Sunshine in 2014 and 2015. Everything was
booked, including the taxi to the airport, but when I woke up that morning I knew
what we had to do, even though at that point there was only one confirmed case
on the whole of the Algarve.
As
you would expect I've marked the start of our 'holiday at home' on my calendar,
but I've also recorded who I came into contact with in the preceding week (as
far as possible - I don’t know the names of the other shoppers when I made my
last trip to the supermarket on 9th March). You might find it useful to do the
same - who knows when this information might come in useful, whether for
contact-tracing or simply for reassurance that you’re free of the virus.
Over
the years I've heard the saying "You can’t be too careful" on
numerous occasions, but at a time like this it really is true. And
because what we do will impact on others as well as ourselves, only the most
selfish (or the most stupid) people are going to ignore the guidelines. I doubt
that anyone reading this newsletter comes into either category - most of us are
old enough to know better!
One
thing that does seem to worry a lot of people is how best to handle shopping - I
found this YouTube video
by a medical doctor very reassuring (thankfully I was already doing most of the
right things). But do please note the updates he has posted just below the video.
Finally,
a tip from my sister - she's discovered that Delia Smith's 1978 cookery series
is available on the BBC
iPlayer (provided you live in the UK). I've got the books of the series,
which I still use - but I might watch it anyway, for old times' sake.
The newsletter was updated on the morning of Wednesday 1st April
to include the Findmypast offer - which isn't, I'm assured, an April Fool's prank!
I also added a note about the YouTube video recommended in Peter's Tips.
Also I've been told that because most public libraries are closed, some
of them are allowing users to access online resources which are normally only available in
the library, such as Ancestry and Findmypast. I don't intend to publish details as this could
overwhelm the services - check your library's website to find out what arrangements, if any, they
are making in your area. In most cases you will need a libary card number, but you might
be able to register online. Even if you already have subscriptions to the major sites, now's a
good time to find out what else your library offers. Most online resources are ALWAYS available
from the comfort of your own home!
I hope you've enjoyed this newsletter - and if you have, do please
tell other family historians about the benefits of LostCousins. It's always
free to join, but now's an especially good time, because there are prizes to be
won in the Easter Egg Hunt and
the site will be completely free over the Easter period. I'll announce the
precise dates in my next newsletter, but don’t wait until then to complete your
My Ancestors page.
Speak to you again soon - in the meantime, look after yourself!
Peter Calver
Founder, LostCousins
© Copyright 2020 Peter Calver
Please do NOT copy or republish any part of this newsletter
without permission - which is only granted in the most exceptional
circumstances. However, you
MAY link to this newsletter or any article in it without asking for permission
- though why not invite other family historians to join LostCousins instead,
since standard membership (which includes the newsletter), is FREE?