Newsletter
- 30th July 2013
Barnardo's to scrap priceless photo archive?
Free
access to England & Wales 1911 census
Last
chance to save at Genes Reunited ENDS THURSDAY
Irish
certificates: clarification
Australia:
National Family History Month
Royal
Australian Air Force casualty database
Name
variants at findmypast - pitfalls and pluses
God helps
those who help themselves
Your
Match Potential has gone up!
2012/13
death rates higher than expected
Church
closures coming to an end
The LostCousins newsletter is
usually published fortnightly. To access the previous newsletter (dated 17 July
2013) click here, for an index to articles
from 2009-10 click here, for
a list of articles from 2011 click here and for a
list of articles from 2012-13 click here.
Whenever possible links are
included to the websites or articles mentioned in the newsletter (they are
highlighted in blue or purple and underlined,
so you can't miss them).For your convenience, when you click on a link a new
browser window or tab will open (so that you don’t lose your place in the newsletter)
- if nothing seems to happen then you need to enable pop-ups in your browser or
change the settings In your security software.
To go to the main LostCousins
website click the logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not already a
member, do join - it's FREE, and you'll get an email to alert you whenever
there's a new edition of this newsletter available!
Barnardo's to scrap
priceless photo archive?
The charity founded by Thomas Barnardo cared for 350,000 children between the 1870s and
1980s, and photographic records were kept of many of the children - indeed some
were used to help raise funds.
According to a recent blog posting
Barnardo's are in the process of digitising their
photographic archive, and may destroy the originals if no organisation can be
found to take over their care. I initially found this hard to believe, since at
the time Barnardo's were still asking former
residents of their homes to send in photographs (you can see the archived page
from 19th July here),
but I emailed the Archive Manager at Barnardo's to
check - and to offer a home for the photos should it be necessary.
Here's her reply:
"I have
made arrangements for the text regarding the donation of images to be removed
from our site, thank you for pointing this out.
"Our
photographic archive is unique and to allow researchers and academics continued
access, we have taken the decision to digitise the material. Hopefully this will enable a greater number
of people who are not physically able to visit the opportunity to study these
historic images.
"A
decision on the final destination of the archives once digitisation is complete
has not yet been made and we will take into consideration any offers we receive
to preserve these historic images."
I know that many LostCousins members
have ancestors who grew up in the care of Dr Barnardo's.
At the present time it costs a minimum of £20 to get a copy of a photograph
(there's a full PDF price list here), so digitisation
could mean that they are much more affordable as well as more accessible, if
the images are placed online. But surely the destruction of the priceless
originals is a price too high?
The best site I've found for information
about Barnardo's is the The Goldonian, a site set up by former pupils of the
William Baker Memorial Technical School, which was based in a country house
near Hertford named 'Goldings' bought by Barnardo's in 1921. If you click on the 'Past homes' link
in the website menu you'll find information and photographs relating to most of
Barnardo's homes.
One
interesting fact I discovered from the site is that the Buxton family, who were
involved in both Barclays Bank and Truman, Hanbury
& Buxton (the brewers) were generous supporters of Barnardo's
- though sadly there's unlikely to be any connection whatsoever with my
impoverished Buxton ancestor (who wasn't really a Buxton anyway - her mother
was widowed long before she was born).
Barnardo's Village Home for Girls was in Barkingside, where the modern Barnardo's has its head office. In 1910, five years after Barnardo's death, the charity bought Gwynne House and the
surrounding estate in nearby Woodford Bridge, and this was turned the Boys'
Garden City (it accommodated girls as well after World War 2).
In 1977 the home closed and the land was
turned into a housing development, the Gwynne Park Estate - and on his
retirement in the early 80s my late father moved into a brand-new house in
Gwynne Park Avenue where he was to live happily for the best part of 30 years.
Free access to England
& Wales 1911 census
Until 14th October you can search the
England & Wales 1911 census free at Ancestry.co.uk; click here
to find out more.
It's a great opportunity to enter your
relatives from 1911 on your My Ancestors
page (although the 1881 census should have priority, because that's the census
your 'lost cousins' are most likely to have used).
Tip:
Remember that whilst the Schedule number is shown on the form the Piece number
isn't, so you'll need to take that from the transcription. Always read the
advice on the Add an Ancestor form - it varies according to the census.
Last chance to save at
Genes Reunited ENDS
THURSDAY
This is your last chance to benefit from
the exclusive offer I've arranged with Genes Reunited - a 12 month Standard
subscription to their UK site for the same price as 6 month subscription when you use the offer code LCGENES
Irish certificates:
clarification
In the last issue I revealed that it's
now possible to ask for Irish certificates to be sent by email - but what I
didn't realise is that the GRO in Roscommon is currently unable to accept
orders by email. This will change when their new website is up and running, but
for now you can only place orders by post or by fax.
Australia: National Family
History Month
August is National Family History Month
in Australia - find out about it here.
Royal Australian Air Force
casualty database
Helen wrote to me about this website, which is one I hadn't come
across before. I'd estimate that there are upwards of 10,000 names on the site.
Note:
in future you're less likely to read about specialised resources like this in
the newsletter because the new LostCousins forum will be a much better medium
to communicate information that - whilst important to a few - won't be of direct
interest to the vast majority of newsletter readers.
Crew Lists at The Genealogist
Most of the 439,000 records in their
database of Royal Navy and Merchant Seaman from 1851-1911 come from the
censuses, but full marks to The Genealogist
for providing a new way to search the records. For example, at findmypast you
can limit your census search to vessels, but you can't search by the name of
the vessel.
Tip:
to search by vessel name at The Genealogist don't use the Master Search, choose
Ship Crew Lists from the Occupational Records dropdown menu, then select the
Advanced Search.
However, the schedules issued to Royal
Navy ships in 1851 have not survived, and most of the schedules in respect of
merchant vessels have also been lost or destroyed (for more information see
Making
Sense of the Census by Edward Higgs). Accordingly, for that year The
Genealogist has used data held by the National Archives in BT98.
Note:
it would appear that The Genealogist has licensed the transcriptions from Family History Indexes, which
for many years has offered CD ROMs based on BT98 - there is a large range of
Scottish and Irish records, but the only English records are for Cornish ports
(however, it's important to bear in mind that seafarers would often be found a
long way from home).
None of us would like to think that
there are any errors in our family trees, but when it comes to online records
there are all sorts of mistakes to contend with, ranging from transcription
errors to misrepresentations - it's a veritable minefield.
But errors can sometimes work in our
favour, provided we're alert. When I was writing the previous article I noticed
that the example that The Genealogist
gives from the 1891 Census is a Captain Noel Stephen Digby,
on HMS Britannia - however, when I looked him up in the 1891 Census at findmypast
he was on dry land (at 4-5 St James Place in Westminster, a stone's throw from
where I found myself working nearly 40 years ago). Ancestry
has him in both places at the same time.
In fact findmypast have got it right -
he was in London on Census Night. If you look closely at the handwritten
schedule for HMS Britannia you'll see that across the top someone has written
"Not to be abstracted" and (in a different hand) "Not on
board".
If you investigate even further you'll
discover that HMS Britannia was the training ship at the Royal Naval College,
Dartmouth - where Prince Charles, his father, grandfather, and
great-grandfather were all cadets. Digby captained
Britannia from 1889 to 1892, when he seems to have retired (although that
didn't prevent him being promoted to Rear-Admiral in 1895). You'll find a
photograph of Digby here.
Anyway, the point I'm making is that an
error can sometimes lead us to discoveries that we wouldn't otherwise have
made. Another verdant source of errors in the 1911 Census - the new questions
relating to children caused all sorts of confusion.
For example, even though those columns
were only supposed to be completed in respect of married women, and should only
have included children born within the present marriage, my great-grandfather
filled them in against his own name, and gave the aggregate figures for BOTH of
his marriages (which confirmed my suspicions that his first wife - my
great-grandmother - gave birth to several children who had died in infancy, and
never appeared on any census).
Another common error on censuses occurs
where the head of the household is a grandparent, and both children and
grandchildren are living in the same household. Quite often you'll find that a
grandchild is described as a son or daughter in the Relationship column, and
when this happens it's usually because the child is listed immediately after
their parent (this can be a particularly helpful clue when the child is
illegitimate).
Never take information at face value -
always consider whether there might be another way of interpreting it. And when
you conclude that a mistake has been made, try to list all the possible reasons
why it might have been made - the first reason you think of may not be the right one!
Name variants at
findmypast - pitfalls and pluses
One of the great features at findmypast
is the way that forename variants work when you're searching the GRO birth,
marriage, and deaths indexes. There were so many changes in the way that names
were indexed in both the 19th and 20th centuries that even now I couldn't tell
you precisely what changes occurred and when.
For much of the 20th century only one
forename was shown in full, whereas from 1837 to about 1873 all forenames were
shown in full. From 1874 onwards two forenames were shown, and this continued
into the early 20th century. For example, the 1894 entry EDWARD, Albert Christian G A P D (Prince) relates to the
future Edward VIII, later the Duke of Windsor.
When you search the GRO
indexes at findmypast with name variants ticked you don't need to know what
the protocol was at a particular time, and this makes it especially easy when
the protocol changes during the period you're searching. For example, a search
for Albert Christian EDWARD not only picks up the royal birth above but also
the 1916 birth of an Albert C EDWARD in Bedwellty, Monmouthshire
- and you also get both results when you search for Albert C EDWARD, which is
very handy.
Tip:
the findmypast search only takes into account the first two forenames, or the
first forename and one initial - other forenames are
disregarded.
By contrast, searching at Ancestry for
Albert Christian EDWARD would find only the first entry, whilst searching for Albert
C EDWARD would find only the second entry (and you'd have to search two
different datasets, because post-1915 records are separate).
Having created such a great system for
searching the GRO indexes, you'd think that findmypast might have done something
similar for census searching - but that doesn't seem to be the case. For
example, if you search the 1891 Census for someone with the forenames 'Noel
Stephen' it won't find Captain Digby because he's
recorded on the census as Noel Stephen T Digby - and it
won't find him if you search for 'Noel Stephen T' because all forenames other
than the first are lumped together as 'Other names', yet the search only takes
into account the first and second name.
Tip:
if you do wish to search the census at findmypast using a middle name or
initial try adding a wildcard character: searching for either 'Noel S*' or
'Noel Stephen*' will find the elusive Captain Digby.
When you search using wildcards you must untick the
'Include variants' box.
God helps those who help themselves
This well-known quotation doesn't come
from the Bible, as many people believe. According to Wikipedia it originated in
ancient Greece, and is used in tragedies from the 5th century BC written by
Sophocles and Euripides.
But whatever its origins, it is a motto
that certainly applies to family history - the more effort you put into your
research, the better the results!
This means taking advantage of all the
resources available to you - not just the records at sites like Ancestry,
findmypast, and FamilySearch but also the most valuable resources of all, your
cousins! You wouldn't believe how many of the people who write to me for help haven't even bothered to complete their My Ancestors page - it makes me wonder why they joined LostCousins
at all.
"I've searched everywhere, I've
asked all my cousins - nobody has the answer" is a common refrain, yet I
rarely hear it from members who understand the benefits of finding 'lost
cousins', because they know that there are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of cousins
out there who they've yet to discover. Of course, they're not all as keen on
family history as you are, but the ones you meet through LostCousins probably
will be (and maybe some of those you meet through Ancestry and Genes Reunited
too).
Remember that if you haven’t completed
your My Ancestors page you're not
just letting yourself down, you're also letting your
cousins down. Isn't it worth an hour of your time to make one of your cousins
happy?
Your Match Potential has gone up!
Are you keeping an eye on your Match Potential (you'll find it on your My Summary page)? It's an excellent guide
to your chances of finding 'lost cousins', and it goes up every time you add
new entries to your My Ancestors page
(especially when they're from the 1881 Census).
However, that's the not the only time it
goes up - it also increases as a result of other members entering their own
relatives! That's because some of those other members are your cousins, and the
most relatives they enter the closer
you are to making the connection.
Tip:
whilst you might only find one or two 'lost cousins' when you first complete
your My Ancestors page, it's something that only needs to be done once - you'll
continue finding cousins even if you don't make another entry!
I received an email recently from a
member who was complaining about a website she'd used. It wasn't a website I'd
recommended in my newsletter, so she wasn't blaming me for what had gone wrong
- she simply felt that others should be warned.
Unfortunately it doesn't work like that.
If I write something uncomplimentary about a website there's a possibility that
I'll be sued for libel, so I have to make sure that what I write is correct.
This isn't a problem when it's a free site, or one to which I already have a
subscription - but the last thing I want to do is give money to a website that
doesn't deserve my custom.
So if you're wondering whether to hand
over money (or data) to a website that you haven't read about in my newsletter,
bear in mind that there could be a reason why
you haven't read about it!
Tip:
to check whether a website has been mentioned in my newsletter enter "site:lostcousins.com website" into Google (where 'website'
is the name of the site you're thinking of using).
As I explained in my last
newsletter, if your main motivation in uploading your family tree to Ancestry
is to make contact with other Ancestry users who are cousins of yours, there's
no need to make your tree public,
with all the risks that involves. Indeed, you might actually make more contacts by having a private tree!
However, as Paul reminded me, when you
designate your tree as private
there's an additional setting that comes into play - it determines whether or
not the deceased relatives in your tree appear in search results (living
relatives should never show up). The information shown will be the person's
name and their place and year of birth, together with your user name - but not
your actual name or your email address.
In my opinion there's relatively little
risk in allowing other Ancestry users to see this limited information. In
theory they could reconstruct your entire tree by searching for every
individual and noting that your user name appears in each case - but in
practice this is extremely unlikely to happen.
By contrast, when you have a public tree there's a strong possibility
that other Ancestry users will copy the information without a please or thank
you - and the chances are that the people who do this won't be nearly as
careful as you have been in your research. Do you really want your meticulous
research to be bolted onto a tree that is riddled with inconsistencies, quite
possibly by someone whose only connection to you is based on little more than
wishful thinking?
Research carried out in the US suggests
that after the age of 55 men are more likely to father daughters than sons, so
I decided to take a look at my own family tree to see whether there was any
evidence of this.
It wasn't easy to find examples -
clearly the father would need to be significantly older than the mother - but
the three children I could find born to fathers of 55 or over were all girls.
However, that could simply be down to chance - and the fact that male children
are more likely to die in infancy (so might not show up at all).
Perhaps one of the software experts who belongs to LostCousins can come up with an app to analyse Gedcom files automatically? Between us LostCousins members
have an enormous resource of data, but analysing it manually would not only be
tedious but potentially subject to errors. Drop me an email if you're
interested in taking on this programming challenge!
2012/13 death rates
higher than expected
I hope it's a statistical anomaly, but
according to a BBC article
published a few days ago the number of people in the UK who died in the 2012/13
financial year was 5% higher than expected (the increase was greatest amongst
the over 80s).
The winter was pretty awful, which can't
have helped, but it's nevertheless a little worrying to come across statistics
like these - particularly since it was only in the last
newsletter that I wrote about the lower than expected numbers of 90
year-olds recorded in the 2011 Census.
Church closures
coming to an end
According to a recent article in The Economist, since 1980 the Church of
England has closed 1074 churches, about 7% of the total. However, it seems that
church closures may be a thing of the past as the Church of England seeks to
make churches part of the community by giving them other purposes - for
example, the popular Michaelhouse Café in Cambridge (rated 4.5 out of 5 at TripAdvisor) is only
open from Monday to Saturday because on Sunday it reverts to its traditional
role as St Michael's Church.
Recently the new(-ish)
Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, announced his
intention to drive payday loan companies like Wonga out of business by using
the resources (in particular the premises and congregations) of the Church of
England to support credit
unions or other community-orientated lenders. My local credit union
typically charges interest rates of just under 20%, which seems extortionate -
but only until you compare it with the 5700% rates that some payday lenders
pocket.
Note:
Zopa, the peer to peer
lender that I wrote about a year ago is going from strength to strength (a
total of £344 million has now been lent). However, credit unions fill a
different gap in the market - they're aimed at people with poorer credit
ratings who might otherwise be tempted by payday lenders.
I was contacted recently by a
LostCousins member who mentioned in passing that her printer had broken down -
so I took some time to talk her through how I choose a printer. I'm sure she
won't mind if I pass the same advice on to you.
I always buy printers for which there
are cheap compatible cartridges available - this usually means not buying the
latest model, and so far it has meant buying Epson every time. I currently pay
about £4 for a complete set of cartridges, whereas Epson would charge £32
(which is not much less than I paid for the multi-function printer itself -
even though it also does scanning and photocopies in black and white or
colour).
If you want to produce top notch photos
on your printer my solution probably won't be good enough for you. But if you
want to save money check out UKDVDR as
they're the people I buy my compatible cartridges from (and blank CD ROMs,
DVDs, Blu Rays etc).
I also came up with this link to some cheap (about £50) Epson
multifunction printers at Amazon.
Although they're newer models than the
one I've got, over half of the reviewers have given them 5 stars, so they must
be pretty good. A set of compatible cartridges is £7.99 from UKDVDR;
when I buy a new printer the first thing I do is sell the unused cartridges
that came with it on eBay - this often recoups a large part of the cost since
there's always someone prepared to pay extra for originals.
That reminds me, there's a company which
widely advertises "low cost" inkjet and toner cartridges but which
you won't find me recommending in my newsletter. It's not just the fact that
their prices aren't as low as they'd like you to think - it's also a reflection
of the enormous difficulty I had getting myself off their
mailing list.
Has anyone tried the free online courses
at Coursera? I've only just come across
this site, and I'd be interested in feedback from anyone with experience. There
are several courses that looked interesting, but sadly there are no genealogy
courses (yet).
If like me you find that you're often in
areas where it's difficult to get a mobile data connection, you might be
interested in the Huawei
E5332 mobile WiFi modem that I've just bought for
under £50 from one of the third party sellers at Amazon.
It's unlocked, so it can work with any network, but most importantly it has a
connection for an external antenna (which I got on eBay for £11.99 including
delivery). In my case I found that it turned a weak signal into a strong one,
which meant I was able to use the Internet and send emails which I was away
from home.
I have used it with both my GiffGaff SIM and
a Three
SIM, but being unlocked it should work with SIMs from any provider, not
only in the UK but also in Europe.
Finally, Family Tree DNA
have cut the price of their Family Finder test to just $99 - that's about half
the price I paid last year! It's impossible to predict what a Family Finder
test might reveal - it's like dipping your hand in a bran tub - but the more
people who take the test, the more we're all going to discover, so I'm all for
lower prices!
Special offer for Harry Potter fans - click here.
I'll be sending out more invitations to
join the LostCousins forum shortly - if you're fortunate enough to receive one
I look forward to seeing you there!
Peter Calver
Founder, LostCousins
© Copyright 2013 Peter Calver
You
MAY link to this newsletter or email a link to your friends and relatives
without asking for permission in advance. I have included bookmarks so you can
link to a specific article: right-click on the relevant entry in the table of
contents at the beginning of the newsletter to copy the link.
Please
DO NOT re-publish any part of this newsletter, other
than the list of contents at the beginning, without permission - either on your
own website, in an email, on paper, or in any other format. It is better for
all concerned to provide a link as suggested above, not least because articles
are often updated.